Hi, MIM students, am posting this because am hoping that you can improve your product review more than just what I got from some of you today. For I know that a product review reflects the idea of the reviewer regarding the features, capabilities or limitations and shortcomings of the product in question. Moreover, the best for a review is when you have captured the intention of the designer.

Knowing that each of you passed a different reviews coming from the same outline resource, I wonder how some of you made it to appear in tables, with ratings and with selections you specified. Most of you did not touch the software (project) so that even if I am going to dis-arrange your reviews and match it to any of the project, it can still tell others. Your work is a generic review. So you need to repeat it.

A product review can tell which is which, not in rumbles.

No need to put it in table form. My outline numbers 1-7, are just your guide to enrich your paragraphs. You can have paragraphs in that arrangements but not tabulated.
When I say specific, why not capture/print screen the specific portion of the product you are explaining so to justify your claim?

If you want to get a higher score, improve, expound, and convince me that if am a potential buyer, I will buy what you are promoting.

Look at several product review in the internet, isn’t it convincing to buy their product?

Hope this will give light to your work. God bless.